Quantitative 3D Analysis of Levator Ani Muscle Subdivisions in Nulliparous Women: MRI Feasibility Study.

BACKGROUND: The levator ani muscle (LAM) is crucial for pelvic floor stability, yet its quantitative MRI assessment is only a recent focus. Our study aims to standardize the quantitative analysis of the LAM morphology within the 3D Pelvic Inclination Correction System (3D-PICS). METHODS: We analyzed 35 static MR datasets from nulliparous women examining the pubovisceral (PVM), iliococcygeal (ICM), coccygeal (COC), and puborectal muscle (PRM). The PVM consists of three origin-insertion pairs, namely the puboanal (PAM), puboperineal (PPM) and pubovaginal muscle (PVaM). The analysis included a quantitative examination of the morphology of LAM, focusing on the median location (x/y/z) (x: anterior-posterior, y: superior-inferior, z: left-right) of the origin and insertion points (a), angles (b) and lengths (c) of LAM. Inter-rater reliability was calculated. RESULTS: Interindividual variations in 3D coordinates among muscle subdivisions were shown. In all, 93% of all origin and insertion points were found within an SD of <8 mm. Angles to the xz-plane range between -15.4° (right PRM) and 40.7° (left PAM). The PRM is the largest pelvic muscle in static MRI. The ICC indicated moderate-to-good agreement between raters. CONCLUSIONS: The accurate morphometry of the LAM and its subdivisions, along with reliable inter-rater agreement, was demonstrated, enhancing the understanding of normal pelvic anatomy in young nulliparous women.

Assessment of pelvic organ prolapse with the Pelvic Inclination Correction System: defining the normal range and threshold to pathology.

PURPOSE: To define the normal range and threshold values for pathologic prolapse on MRI using the PICS line and assess its correlation with the pubococcygeal line (PCL). METHODS: This prospective, IRB-approved study included 20 nulliparous volunteers and 18 prolapse patients (POP-Q Stage ≥ 2). Organ positions (bladder, cervix, anorectal junction) relative to PICS and PCL were measured on dynamic MRI. Differences in organ position were compared. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify cutoff values for prolapse using the PICS line. The correlation between PICS and PCL measurements was tested with Spearman's rank correlation. RESULTS: In volunteers, median bladder and cervix positions measured to the PICS at rest were - 2.7 cm and - 5.3 cm compared to - 1.9 cm and - 2.7 cm in patients (p < 0.001). During straining, bladder and cervix were at - 0.9 cm and - 3.2 cm in volunteers versus + 2.5 cm and + 2.5 cm in patients (p < 0.001). Correlation was strong for PICS and PCL measurements for all three compartments (δ = 0.883-0.970, p ≤ 0.001). AUCs of PICS for the anterior and middle compartment were 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96-1.00, p < 0.001) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.89-1.00, p < 0.001) for differentiating patients from healthy volunteers. AUC for the posterior compartment was 0.76 (95% CI 0.57-0.96, p = 0.034). CONCLUSION: PICS measurements reliably differentiate patients from volunteers in the anterior and middle compartment. Future studies need to identify a reliable threshold for the posterior compartment. PICS and PCL measurements are strongly correlated.

The 3D Pelvic Inclination Correction System (PICS): A universally applicable coordinate system for isovolumetric imaging measurements, tested in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

In pelvic organ prolapse (POP), the organs are pushed downward along the lines of gravity, so measurements along this longitudinal body axis are desirable. We propose a universally applicable 3D coordinate system that corrects for changes in pelvic inclination and that allows the localization of any point in the pelvis at rest or under dynamic conditions on magnetic resonance images (MRI) of pelvic floor disorders in a scanner- and software independent manner. The proposed 3D coordinate system called 3D Pelvic Inclination Correction System (PICS) is constructed utilizing four bony landmark points, with the origin set at the inferior pubic point, and three additional points at the sacrum (sacrococcygeal joint) and both ischial spines, which are clearly visible on MRI images. The feasibility and applicability of the moving frame was evaluated using MRI datasets from five women with pelvic organ prolapse, three undergoing static MRI and two undergoing dynamic MRI of the pelvic floor in a supine position. The construction of the coordinate system was performed utilizing the selected landmarks, with an initial implementation completed in MATLAB. In all cases the selected landmarks were clearly visible, with the construction of the 3D PICS and measurement of pelvic organ positions performed without difficulty. The resulting distance from the organ position to the horizontal PICS plane was compared to a traditional measure based on standard measurements in 2D slices. The two approaches demonstrated good agreement in each of the cases. The developed approach makes quantitative assessment of pelvic organ position in a physiologically relevant 3D coordinate system possible independent of pelvic movement relative to the scanner. It allows the accurate study of the physiologic range of organ location along the body axis ("up or down") as well as defects of the pelvic sidewall or birth-related pelvic floor injuries outside the midsagittal plane, not possible before in a 2D reference line system. Measures in 3D can be monitored over time and may reveal pathology before bothersome symptoms appear, as well as allowing comparison of outcomes between different patient pools after different surgical approaches.